I'm not expressly trying to solicit discussion, but you're certainly welcome to add your own comments so long as they are on topic, thoughtful and not unduly disrespectful. You need not agree with me and you may post anonymously if you prefer. That said, I reserve the right to yank nonsense and spam.

** Update 8 June 2013 **
While I continue to monitor this blog, please note I have changed to a different hosting service and therefore a new blog. If you'd like to stay current, please visit me at My Sens-iety.
Showing posts with label Kirk Nurmi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kirk Nurmi. Show all posts

Thursday, May 16, 2013

Arias: Penalty Phase 5/16 (1)

Proceeding Notes & Opinions

These are my notes, not a verbatim transcript.


Opening Statements


JUDGE STEPHENS: Reads jury instructions.


KIRK NURMI: Opening Statement.  Tells the jury they will decide whether Arias lives or dies.  Your verdict is not a recommendation.  Miss Arias was presumed to be innocent, the state was required to prove she was not. You each have to make your own moral assessment as to which verdict is correct. 
Miss Arias has the burden of proof for mitigating factors.  Miss Arias will have an opportunity to talk to you.  Reminds jury they can consider evidence from any phase of this trial.  He suggests all twelve jurors do not have to agree on every mitigating factor during this phase so long as they agree on the verdict.  Will hear from Jodi Arias, Patti Womack, Darryl Brewer.  "...when you understand who Miss Arias is, you will understand that life is the appropriate penalty."
Mitigation

Mitigating circumstances are any factors that are a basis for a life sentence instead of a death sentence, so long as they relate to any sympathetic or other aspect of the Defendant's character, propensity, history or record, or circumstances of the offense.

Mitigating circumstances are not an excuse or justification for the offenses, but are factors that in fairness or mercy may reduce the Defendant's moral culpability.

Mitigating circumstances may be offered by the Defendant or State or be apparent from the evidence presented at any phase of these proceedings...

The circumstances proposed as mitigation by the Defendant for your consideration in this case are:
  1. Defendant was 27 years old at the time of the offense.
  2. Defendant has no prior criminal history.
  3. Defendant was a good friend.
  4. Defendant lacked support from her family.
  5. Defendant suffered abuse and neglect as a child and as an adult.
  6. Defendant tried to make the best of her life.
  7. Defendant consistently tried to improve herself.
  8. Defendant is a talented artist.
You are not limited to these proposed mitigating circumstances in considering the appropriate sentence...



JUAN MARTINEZ:  You are not to act as an advocate or investigator to find mitigating factors.  Your duty is to look at all the evidence and judge the fairness to both the defendant and the victim.  The eight factors presented by the defense [mitigators] are flawed... As to the mitigating factors, the connection or lack of connection to the murder may affect the quality.  For instance, Defendant was 27 years old; there's no connection to her age and the fact she stuck a knife into the victim's chest... There is no connection.  The connection of mitigators to the crime is something you may consider.  Example, being a good friend has no connection.  Support of her mother has no connection.  Childhood abuse has no connection.  Artistry has no connection.  No criminal history but she testified she was untruthful to you, clarified to refer to the gas can being returned [perjury].  Good relationship with Mr. Brewer's child has no connection.  That she lacked support from her family... this comes only from the defendant's mouth.  That she suffered abuse and neglect... no evidence was presented in support of that.  That she's trying to improve herself... that's what most people do.  That she's a talented artist and photographer... she can take Calvin Klein photos of Travis in the shower and take photos of her crime then delete the images.  There ARE no mitigating factors in this case.  The proper verdict is death.

STEPHENS: Calls 5-minute recess.  Jury leaves. Counsel approaches the bench. Arias leaves.



Victim Impact Statements


STEPHENS: Calls for the jury.  Victim impact statements will be read to you.

MARTINEZ: Submits exhibits. Calls Stephen Alexander, younger brother of Travis.

STEPHEN ALEXANDER: [Facing the jury, his back to Arias]  Got the news of Travis' death from his sister, Samantha, over the phone.  He cries and asks why.  I thought my brother was bulletproof.  He was in two motorcycle crashes, wrecked several cars, rolled a snow mobile... who on earth would want to do this to him?  I won't ever get the answers to most of my questions.  How much did he suffer?  How much did he scream?  What was he saying?  What was the last thing he saw before his eyes closed?... [Exhibit #656 showing Stephen and Travis singing]... He now has nightmares of being attacked with a knife... cannot sleep alone in the dark anymore... dreams of his brother thrown in the shower, left to rot in there all alone... doesn't want to have to see his brother's murderer anymore... or hear his name dragged through the mud anymore... has ulcers and is on anti-depressants... distances himself from everybody and ultimately separated from his wife... poor daughter has to be passed back and forth between parents... he misses them very much and can't wait for this to end so they can get back to their lives... Travis left a notecard to "Call Stephen" but he never got the call... now when I want to see my brother I have to go to a six-foot-deep hole in the ground.  He was meant to do so much more, never got to live his dreams, meet his goals.  In 2008 he blogged his affirmations: "This year will be the best year of my life... a year where the impossible will become commonplace..." [Stephen continues with the powerful, powerful words directly from Travis regarding his life plans; incredibly eloquent.]  People across the globe have been influenced by him.  He has a legacy.  We have to make sure it survives.  He was so brutally ripped out of this world, my world.  Hopefully one day I can make him proud.

MARTINEZ: Calls Samantha Alexander, younger sister of Travis.

SAMANTHA ALEXANDER: [In tears before she begins]  This tragedy has forever changed the lives of the siblings.   My family has been tortured by the loss of Travis.  Travis was the one who got them through the pain of the loss of their parents.  [Exhibit #659, photo of Travis and grandmother who died shortly before jury selection].  Losing Travis has destroyed the overall health of our family.  Travis was our strength, our constant beacon of hope.  His giving spirit, his determination for accomplishment and his endless strength as a foundation for our family has been taken from us and can never be replaced.  He motivated us with topics he will never be allowed to live out.  We'll never the same.  Travis never took anything for granted.  He was not shy.  He was full of life.  If he were to walk in this room you'd immediately feel his warmth.  He had the ability to make others feel appreciated and loved and good about themselves.  "The difference between a stumbling block and a stepping stone is the character of the individual walking the path," wrote Travis [also quoted by Stephen].  He motivated us to make our lives better than the ones we were born into.  His potential was cut short.  A couple of weeks before his death, he came to see me in southern California.  He let me read the preface to his book.  We both agreed no matter how miserable we were, our childhood made us strong and able to conquer anything. [Exhibit #660, photo of Travis and Samantha taken during the visit, a photo she will forever cherish].  On the morning of June 10 she was on a river trip and checked her voice mail before going out onto the river... got the voicemail from her grandmother who had been crying... she knew someone was dead... sister Tanisha answered the phone screaming "Travis is dead!"  To this day my mind paints a picture of what happened the night Travis was taken.  The thoughts of what Travis must have went through that day, the pain, the screams, the agony, the fear when Travis was being brutally taken.   We have heard every detail of the crime.  I'm a police officer, some of these photos are more gruesome than anything I've ever seen in eleven years in law enforcement.  Our minds are stained with the image of his body slumped dead in the shower.  Our family has born the burden of financial hardship to be here, being away from our loved ones, stepping away from our duties in the workplace.  Travis was the only family member who lived in Arizona, making it very difficult for us to be here.  These are [the type of] times when we would have expected to look to Travis for support.  To have him taken so barbarically is beyond any words to describe our loss.  We will miss his contagious laughter, his jokes, his funny dances, his help in hard situations, his guidance when we are lost, his motivation, his insight, his huge smile [Exhibit #661, closeup of Travis]... he was the glue in our family.  We have not been together since Travis has been gone... it's simply too hard to think of that one empty chair.  Travis had an incredible heart, a huge heart, that will forever be missed.  Our lives will never be the same.  We can never get him back.  We are so grateful for him, lucky and blessed for the time we had with him.  We would give anything to have him back.  Thank you.

MARTINEZ:  Nothing further.

STEPHENS:  Calls noon recess.  Resume at 2pm Pacific.  Jury leaves.  Counsel approach.



To be continued...

Arias: Attorneys Say 'WE QUIT'

HLN reports this morning on the Morning Express program that attorneys Kirk Nurmi and Jennifer Willmott filed a motion with the court to withdraw from representing Jodi Arias following her post-conviction interview with KSAZ-TV.  Judge Sherry K. Stephens denied the motion.  [Ref. Court Document PDF]

It's no secret Kirk Nurmi has been trying to withdraw from representing Arias for years however, because the Arizona law seems to prohibit withdrawal unless another attorney is fully prepared to take over, the court has forced him to remain on the case.  I have not heard any rumors of Jennifer Willmott asking to withdraw prior to this motion.

It's clear to me Jodi Arias has been pulling the puppet strings during the trial, forcing her attorneys to present and argue what most view to be a ludicrous defense theory based on a plethora of lies.  I can't begin to imagine how difficult their day-to-day lives have been made by having to deal with this mental, remorseless woman.  I wish them well and hope they are able to extricate themselves from her toxic web at the conclusion of the penalty phase.

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Arias: Senseless Defense

During his closing argument in the Jodi Arias murder trial, attorney Kirk Nurmi presented three separate themes:
  • Jodi was not on a covert mission.
  • Jodi left a paper trail.
  • Jodi didn't need to wait until Travis was in the shower to kill him.
The above arguments are nothing more than a desperate smokescreen to confuse dull-witted jurors.  Nurmi wants us to focus on the simple fact that her road trip wasn't covert.  That's a No Duh fact.  But the argument ignores the fact that the only portion of the road trip that was covert was the leg into Mesa, Arizona.  Below, I address a few of the more ridiculous arguments:
  • It makes no sense that Jodi staged a burglary to get a gun.  I say it makes perfect sense.  That was a great way to (a) get a gun and (b) avoid any evidence that she had it.  A "smart" girl certainly wouldn't have asked to borrow one from family or friends!
  • It makes no sense that Jodi was on a covert mission to kill Travis.  I say it makes perfect sense.  She needed to get to Arizona to kill him but she couldn't just disappear from 6/2 to 6/9.  There would be too many questions asked.  It was much easier to advertise a road trip to Utah, a road trip during which a jog into Arizona, theoretically, could go undetected.
  • It makes no sense that Jodi rented a car.  I say it makes perfect sense.  There was no reason to hide the rental car since she was taking a well-advertized road trip and everyone already knew her own car wasn't in the best shape to take such a trip.
  • It makes no sense that Jodi saved the trip receipts.  I say it makes perfect sense.  She needed documentation of her road trip to "prove" she was nowhere near Arizona and to bolster her alibi.  And remember, we don't know what receipts she actually did destroy, if any.
  • It makes no sense for Jodi to borrow gas cans.  I say it makes perfect sense.  She knew Darryl wouldn't be suspicious because the two of them had taken gas cans on road trips in the past. Why buy three gas cans when she could borrow two?  Money was tight, right?  [Nurmi thinks it would have been smart to borrow a gun and a car but not a couple of gas cans?]
  • It makes no sense for Jodi to save the cash receipt for the third gas can.  Here, I'd have to agree.  But so what?  Criminals do make stupid mistakes that trip them up.  Equally stupid is Jodi making three separate purchases for gas at the same station in rapid sequence -- and doing it twice (once in Pasadena and once in Salt Lake City).
  • It makes no sense that Jodi turned off her cell phone.  I say that makes perfect sense.  You can argue the phone just went dead all you want, Mr. Nurmi, but it's too convenient to be a mere coincidence.  Besides, if it just went dead, why would she call Gus Searcy in a frantic fit saying she'd lost her phone and convince him to give her a new one?
  • It makes no sense that Jodi didn't kill Travis at the first opportunity.  Since Jodi Arias is a pathological liar, we will never know exactly what happened once she arrived at the home of Travis Alexander on June 4th, 2008.  What we do know is that Jodi craved the attention of Travis and that she is known for a "light switch" pattern of mood swings.  While she may have made the trip with the intent to kill, she may have had a cooling off period after she arrived if Travis acted particularly attentive (which it seems he did).  Most of us believe her purpose for being there that day was simple:  either Travis would take her to Cancun or he would die.  I can imagine her snapping the photos of him in the shower and making a manipulative remark such as, "You're going to look so amazing in Cancun.  I wish I could be there to see it."  He may have replied, "No, Jodi, we've talked about this.  You're not going."  Lights out. 

Friday, May 3, 2013

Arias: Closing Arguments (Defense)

Dismissed Juror #8 shows up in the gallery today.  This is just as bizarre as when Juror #5 showed up in the gallery the day after her dismissal.

Summary:  Nurmi's theme, if I may paraphrase, is that his client isn't very bright because nothing she did before the murder makes any sense.  With all due respect, Mr. Nurmi, the brains of sociopaths and psychopaths don't work like normal brains.  All the jury has to understand is everything made perfect sense to Jodi.

"Fear, love, sex, lies and dirty little secrets," opened defense attorney Kirk Nurmi.  He states it's the jury's job to determine what happened on June 4, 2008, between 5:30:30 and 5:32:16.  Was it a plan or something forced on Jodi by Mr. Alexander?  [Translation: All that matters is those three minutes.  Jodi is never to blame.]

Next, Nurmi appeals to that hanging juror to not succumb to fear... don't be persuaded by other jurors who disagree with you.   This case is not about Snow White or the Seven Dwarves.  It's not about bad haircuts or the sexual orientation of one of the witnesses.   It's not about whether you like Jodi Arias.  Nine out of ten days, I don't even like Jodi Arias.  That doesn't matter.

It's not about sitting before the cameras of Inside Edition and saying no jury will convict her.  It's about what happened between exhibit #159 and #162.  He asserts the theory of a premeditated plan doesn't make any sense.  She was not obsessed with Travis, she moved away.  She joined LDS Linkup to find another man.  She'd already had her sights set on Ryan Burns.  [Okay, so then explain why she was still stalking Travis.]

Stealing the gun makes no sense.  She didn't have to stage a burglary, she could have just taken it and nobody may have ever known.  She could have taken one of her father's unregistered guns, but she didn't.  That doesn't make any sense.  She could have taken a gun from Matt McCartney.  Is that behavior consistent with a smart woman who is planning a covert mission... Why would you start a trail?  [Duh!  Because she didn't want anyone to know she had a gun!  Stealing one made perfect sense to her.]

She needs a way to get to Mesa.  She could have driven her own car.  Maybe it wasn't in the best mechanical state, but it may have been recognized.  She could have borrowed a car from her family.  No paper trail.  They could have rented a car for her.  But no, she drove to Redding and rented a car from Budget.  An airport with security cameras.  That doesn't make any sense if you're on a covert mission.  [Translation: My client's plan was stupid.  Here, I'd have to agree.]

Jodi's hair wasn't blonde when she rented the car.  Mr. Colombo was just confused because her driver's license showed her as a blonde.  Jodi's hair was brown on 5/15.  Red car/white car... big deal.

She didn't go straight from Redding to Mesa, proving she wasn't on a mission.  Instead, she stops in Monterey and visits two former boyfriends.  This crazy woman who can't let it go has relationships with [them].   The mission isn't quite so covert now, is it?  And why would she tell Darryl Brewer she was going to Mesa if it was supposed to be covert. [Uh, didn't you and your client previously insist she never told him that?]

She borrows gas cans but that doesn't make sense.  She could have bought them and nobody would have been the wiser.  Instead she borrows them because she's going to cross the desert.  [But she testified she couldn't afford to buy gas cans.]

She goes to the bank in Monterey (two accounts).  She deposits some money in one account and money into another account.  Why do your banking transactions and leave a trail?  [Because she didn't have that money when she was back in Yreka?]

Nurmi denies Jodi testified that she returned the gas can to the same Walmart on the same day. [MIS-STATES THE EVIDENCE!]

There's no verdict form to convict Jodi Arias of lying.

Messing with the license plates makes no sense.  That would attract the attention of law enforcement.  That doesn't make any sense.  [Yep, Jodi's not as bright as she thinks.]

I'm sorry. I can't blog any more of this bullcrap. I'm done.

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Arias: Nurmi Acts Wormy


I'm relieved to see I'm not the only court watcher who believes Kirk Nurmi went way over the line today in his cross-examination of Deanna Reid.  Reid, former girlfriend of Travis Alexander, was called to the stand as part of the state's rebuttal case against Jodi Arias.  Under direct examination by prosecutor Juan Martinez, Reid revealed a portrait of Alexander seldom seen in this courtroom.  The couple dated from 2000-2005, having what most people would consider a normal, healthy relationship (Mormon prohibitions aside).  Once Reid realized the relationship would never result in marriage, she advised Alexander she wanted to move on.  The couple remained friends and kept in contact up until May, 2008 -- shortly before his death.

On cross-examination, Nurmi droned on in his zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz style, rehashing testimonial territory already covered on direct.  Just as I was wondering why he bothered getting out of his recliner for this, he switched tracks and attacked Reid, forcing her to admit to having had a sexual relationship with Alexander -- unnecessary and irrelevant questioning in every respect.  Why didn't Martinez object?!

Making a bad blunder worse, Nurmi went on to question Reid as to whether Alexander had ever called her any of the long litany of x-rated names he'd used on Jodi Arias.  Primacy and Recency... I'm sure that's the only excuse Nurmi had for "going there" with this witness.  He couldn't leave the jury with an image of Travis as a nice guy.  While that may be a good defense tactic in theory, I would bet my last nickle the jury will be as offended by it as are the rest of us.  God speed Deanna Reid for handling it like a lady.

Is there evidence Alexander ever treated any other woman in the manner he treated Arias?  Not that I've seen.  Perhaps that's because he had a preference for Good Mormon Women (e.g. Deanna Reid, Lisa Andrews-Daidone and Marie "MiMi" Hall).  What he learned was that even though he could make Jodi a Mormon, he could never make her a good one.  Nor could he ever be rid of her.

Snark Alert

I get a kick out of Kirk Nurmi's cheek-puffs.  I snapped a screenshot of him doing it a couple of times...