I'm not expressly trying to solicit discussion, but you're certainly welcome to add your own comments so long as they are on topic, thoughtful and not unduly disrespectful. You need not agree with me and you may post anonymously if you prefer. That said, I reserve the right to yank nonsense and spam.

** Update 8 June 2013 **
While I continue to monitor this blog, please note I have changed to a different hosting service and therefore a new blog. If you'd like to stay current, please visit me at My Sens-iety.
Showing posts with label Patti Womack. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Patti Womack. Show all posts

Monday, May 20, 2013

Arias: Defense Files Again for Mistrial

12:02pm Central: Breaking news this morning on HLN's Raising America.  OMG this circus is never going to end.  Now we know why court is starting late for the four millionth time.  Commentating defense attorney Jason Lamm speaking on HLN gives us a new phrase to describe the Arias defense strategy of filing yet another mistrial motion today...

Fecal Adhesion

12:13pm Central:  [Great Seal of the State of Arizona]... HLN reports an ex-parte meeting with the defense.

12:20pm Central:  [Great Seal of the State of Arizona]... Mike Galanos on HLN does not list Patti Womack on today's lineup though he does not specifically say she will not testify.  He mentions only Darryl Brewer and Jodi Arias.

12:29pm Central:  [Live feed begins]



The following represents my notes for todays proceedings and not a true transcript.



Evil Stare
JUDGE STEPHENS:  Motion from Nurmi to hear mistrial motion in open court will be heard. [Jury is not present]

NURMI:  Court had a duty to protect the Defendant's right to a fair trial and failed to do so.  All previous requests for mistrial were denied.  Failure to sequester was denied.  Claims of witness intimidation restated (Womack and LaViolette, both still under seal).  Claims Ms. Womack now cannot come forward and testify on behalf of Arias.  The intimidation is evidence the picture is not complete for this jury.  The state offers no support for their opposition to the mistrial.  Claims mistrial is the only lawful remedy.

MARTINEZ:  Issue before the court today regards only Ms. Womack.  The issue is why she's not here to testify.  I conducted an interview with Ms. Womack and she failed to answer questions regarding drug use of herself and the Defendant.  She left the room with Jennifer Willmott and Kirk Nurmi, not her attorneys.  When she returned, Womack's Fifth Amendment right was asserted and she stated it was her belief she should assert them.  She faces prosecution for not reporting income from "some photographs" and for "use of illicit drugs".  She has some sort of substance abuse problem.  She came to court on Thursday May 16 and at that time the court appointed an attorney, Kenneth Countryman, who wanted to wait until Monday to make a determination.  It's the State's belief, based on her silence, she would have continued to assert her rights and been excluded from testifying.  Makes a copy of the interview available from the May 15 interview as evidence as what happened.  Womack is not here to testify.

NURMI:  The truth doesn't associate with what he's saying.  We never advised Ms. Womack.  When this court allows a prosecutor to attack [a witness]... we don't know whether it's true that Ms. Womack would plead the Fifth... the effect on Ms. Arias would be the same.  Ms. Arias has a right to  present a full and complete case during mitigation.

STEPHENS:  Defense has failed to prove its case.  Sealed proceedings outside the courtroom will not be revealed.  Any witness the Defense wishes to call may be called in sealed proceedings.  The court can only speculate why Ms. Womack is not here today as well as other witnesses who could possibly testify.  Motion Denied.

NURMI:  Ms. Willmott and I again request to withdraw from the case.  We cannot fulfill our duty to the Defendant.

STEPHENS:  Motion to withdraw denied.

NURMI:  We will not be calling witnesses during this phase.

STEPHENS:  I assume your client does wish to allocute.

NURMI:  May we approach?  [sidebar]

[JURY ENTERS THE COURTROOM]

[Live feed defaults to the Great Seal]

12:58pm Central:  [Live feed resumes.  Jury has left the courtroom.]

STEPHENS:  Due to ex-parte meeting with defendant which shall be sealed, court will be adjourned for today and resume tomorrow.

MARTINEZ:  Ms Womack stated she would not be able to testify to Arias having a bad childhood.  [Implies her testimony would not be crucial to the Defense.]

NURMI:  We believe a jury instruction as to why Ms. Womack is not going to testify is appropriate.  Asks for a stay of the proceedings.

STEPHENS:  I will say [Womack] is unavailable.  Stay is denied.

MARTINEZ:  May we approach? [sidebar]

STEPHENS:  Calls for the jury.  We are unable to proceed.  Please return tomorrow morning at 9:30 [Pacific].  You are excused.  [Jury leaves.]  We are at recess.



Footnotes:
I think it's being implied Alyce LaViolette would have been called to testify in this phase of the trial however Nurmi's opening statement did not mention her (only Womack and Darryl Brewer).  It's not clear why Darryl Brewer didn't show up today [the Judge commented no witnesses were present today].  Nor is it clear why proceedings couldn't continue with testimony from Jodi Arias.

Jane Velez-Mitchell reports tonight during her program on HLN that she and her producer saw Darryl Brewer waiting at a nearby hotel for a call from the Defense to come on over to testify.  That call never came.  Apparently he was not intimidated at all by Juan Martinez and has nothing to hide. [Update 6:21pm Central]

Arias: Why Sandy Can't Testify

Many believe Sandy Arias, mother of convicted murderer Jodi Arias, could provide powerful support for mitigation in this case.  Even though Sandy appears to want to testify on her daughter's behalf, that simply cannot happen.

First of all, two of the mitigating factors the Defense announced they will argue is that Jodi (1) was neglected and abused as a child and (2) lacked support from her family.  Putting any family member on the stand to testify in a positive way about Jodi would subject them to intense rebuttal arguments by Prosecutor Juan Martinez.

Second of all, the jury has been prevented from seeing the heartbreaking interview Sandy gave to Detective Flores on July 15, 2008, where she admits Jodi has mental problems and that she herself first suspected Jodi may have had something to do with the death of Travis Alexander.  If Sandy takes the stand, Juan Martinez could use that video for impeachment -- and that would be absolutely devastating to the Defense.

Lastly, Sandy Arias (in order to support the Defense allegations) would have to "admit" to being abusive and neglectful.  Since we know that didn't happen (or at least seriously doubt that it did), Sandy would be forced to perjure herself.  That would open the door for Martinez to pull out the interviews done by Patti Womack with Nancy Grace and 48 Hours relating what an idyllic childhood Jodi Arias had.

I believe Kirk Nurmi and Jennifer Willmott are (and well should be) concerned about the potential to suborn perjury by putting any of the Arias family members on the stand.  They have to continue to cope with their own client's lies but they don't need to make a bad situation worse.

Friday, May 17, 2013

Arias: What's Up With Patti?

Patti Womack with Sandy Arias
Patti Womack Salutes Juan Martinez
Court was abruptly ended yesterday following an in-chambers meeting with Arias friend Patti Womack.  According to Kirk Nurmi's opening statement, Womack would be called to testify on behalf of Arias.

It was later confirmed that Judge Stephens ordered that Womack's testimony would be "audio only" (ala Darryl Brewer during the main trial).  But there seems to be more to the story...

Internet rumors are flying that Womack will not testify after all due to some legal complications involving drugs and/or alcohol.  Is this true?  Please leave a comment if you have anything more concrete to report (e.g. a link to a reputable media story, court documents, etc.).  In the meantime, I'll keep my eyes open and report back if I find something.

UPDATE 11:12AM CENTRAL:  HLN's Jean Casarez just reported that the testimony of Womack will be made without video or audio taping.

UPDATE 2:44PM CENTRAL:  I found this post by RobynD323 on TwitLonger... interesting read, but I have no idea whether it's reliable.  I'm not familiar with the source.  General gist of the post:  Patti showed up for court on Thursday improperly dressed and possibly impaired.

UPDATE 10:13AM CENTRAL 20 MAY 2013:  HLN's Mike Galanos reports it's not certain whether either Patti Womack or Sandy Arias will testify.

UPDATE 11:05AM CENTRAL 20 MAY 2013:  HLN's Jean Casarez does not believe we will hear from Patti Womack, that she's a reluctant witness.

UPDATE 12:49PM CENTRAL 20 MAY 2013:  Courtroom proceedings today revealed Patti invoked her Fifth Amendment rights and failed to appear in court today. [See this blog post]


Footnote: From what I gather, her full name is Patrisha Fawn Womack (not Patricia) but she goes by Patti and not Patty.



UPDATE 17 JUNE 2013:  A hearty hello and welcome to all the new readers coming over from FB (you know who you are). Keep the faith.

UPDATE 18 JUNE 2013: *BLOG NOTICE* This blog is being moderated. I support and respect your right to freedom of speech, just not your right to do it here.  One of the three rules I've set forth for comments at the top of every blog page is that they not be unduly disrespectful -- to me or anyone else. The two remaining rules are that the comments be on topic and thoughtful.  Any comment which primarily consists of name calling or borders on what I consider hate speech will not be approved.  If you can find a way to express your opinion and still abide by my rules, your comments will be welcome.

Thursday, May 16, 2013

Arias: Penalty Phase 5/16 (2)

Proceeding Notes & Opinions - Mitigation

These are my notes, not a verbatim transcript.  Part 1, Victim Impact Statements.

While waiting for court to resume, I get goofy angry with talking heads calling for Jodi Arias to apologize.  In the first place, she is not at all sorry.  In her warped mind, Travis made her kill him -- she did nothing wrong.  She is the victim here, not Travis.  And, in the second place, nobody would believe any apology pushed across her lips as being anything more than just another manipulative, self-serving lie.  Come on, people, stop wasting your breath harping about an apology.

2:10pm Pacific - HLN just reported Patti Womack, friend of Arias and expected mitigation witness, is in chambers with the judge.

2:20pm Pacific - Still staring at the state seal.  Holly Hughes on HLN's Evening Express speculates Arias will use her artwork as the big-gun mitigating factor... that she will sell her artwork and give the profits to victims of domestic violence.  Uh, right.  I'm betting only a portion of the profits (i.e. her 10% tithing mentioned in the KSAZ-TV interview) will go anywhere other than her own commissary account.  And should the State choose to go after her for legal expenses (as Florida did against Casey Anthony), she'll probably cease to be an artist altogether.

2:30pm Pacific - The in-chambers meeting is still in progress.

2:40pm Pacific - Ditto.  Good Lord, is this witness backing out or what?  She's probably scared she'll get cross-examined about the pot-growing incident.  In an interview she gave to Nancy Grace she declined to talk about that when asked.  It's not as if the statute of limitations didn't run out eons ago.  So is there something else she doesn't want to testify to if asked?

2:44pm Pacific - Jean Casarez, HLN legal correspondent, reports the Alexander family being escorted into the judge's chambers by Juan Martinez.

Patti Womack with Sandy Arias
3:00pm Pacific - Judge has ordered that Patti Womack's testimony will be audio only.  Darryl Brewer, previously restricted to audio only will now have no restrictions.  Criminitaly!!  You wasted an hour of everyone's time on petty crap like this?  Patti's face has been all over the television [Nancy Grace Show] and internet.  Now she's shy?

3:05pm Pacific - How do we get here?  Arias wants to die.  Nurmi and Willmott want off the case.  Now we have to hear how we should spare her in spite of herself.

3:11pm Pacific - Now HLN reports everyone except the families have been asked to leave the courtroom.  What a circus!

3:15pm Pacific - Casarez now reports the family has been asked to leave the courtroom. 

3:28pm Pacific - I'm seeing video from inside the courtroom.  Maybe we're actually going to have court again today. 


JUDGE STEPHENS: Apologizes for the delay.  We're unable to proceed this afternoon.  Please return on Monday at 10am.  You are excused.

To be continued ...someday.