I'm not expressly trying to solicit discussion, but you're certainly welcome to add your own comments so long as they are on topic, thoughtful and not unduly disrespectful. You need not agree with me and you may post anonymously if you prefer. That said, I reserve the right to yank nonsense and spam.

** Update 8 June 2013 **
While I continue to monitor this blog, please note I have changed to a different hosting service and therefore a new blog. If you'd like to stay current, please visit me at My Sens-iety.

Thursday, April 11, 2013

Arias: Sex and the Priesthood

Arias Trial - Witness Bias

I take back anything nice I ever said to or about Alyce LaViolette.  She is no longer "credible" in my eyes.  I can't wait to see if the Jury questions reflect the outrage I'm feeling right now toward this witness.


GENDER BIAS:  LaViolette thinks Travis is a big fat rat liar because he was not telling the world the truth about his lack of virginity.  Gasp, omg, shoot a priesthood member for not wanting his church and friends to know he's had s e x.  Oh wait, Jodi already shot him.  Of course LaViolette finds Jodi to be "credible" and "truthful".  That's because Jodi "only" lied about murdering Travis.  LaViolette believes anyone who says Jodi is a pathological liar -- or even a sociopath -- is not "credible".  Later, on redirect, LaViolette asserts Jodi is not a good liar, otherwise she'd have done a better job at it.  Smart as Einstein, eh?

GENDER BIAS:  LaViolette believes Jodi was afraid of Travis even though (a) she never told anyone that until after she murdered him, (b) she never reported abuse to anyone and (c) she continued to sleep with Travis.  Conversely, LaViolette believes Travis was NOT afraid of Jodi even though (a) he told people he was extremely afraid of her, (b) he told people she'd been stalking him and (c) he continued to sleep with Jodi.  [facepalm]

REMINDER:  Following more than a week of domestic abuse testimony aimed at destroying Travis's reputation, it's easy to lose sight of the fact that the subject is entirely irrelevant in this case, just another red herring presented by the "credible" [not] Jodi Arias.  In my opinion, evidence pointing to a cold-blooded, premeditated murder is simply overwhelming.  If Jodi had killed him in self defense, she'd have absolutely no reason to take a coverup to such an extreme (and, frankly, ludicrous) length.  Catch a replay of Jodi's testimony and watch her smirking as she recounts her ridiculous story.  And remember she said she couldn't say whether or not she'd have ever turned herself in if she hadn't gotten caught.

No comments:

Post a Comment